You are here
Chief Legal Officers, Local Government Attorneys, and Ethics Officers
Friday, April 13th, 2012
Robert Wechsler
The Schumpeter
column in this week's Economist talks about the corporate
chief legal officer (CLO), who due to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's
requirements has become a major figure at the top of every big
corporation. Much as the city or county attorney is a major figure
at the top of every local government.
What struck me about the column is how similar Schumpeter's description of the CLO is to how a city or county attorney should be, but too often is not. One CLO is quoted as saying that "before taking the job, a lawyer should interview his chief executive. If you can’t say no to that person, 'you don’t want to work for that company.'" How many city attorneys have done this?
Government attorneys should recognize that they have an even stronger obligation than a CLO to be independent and to think about the reputation of the government rather than of its high-level officials. Saying "No" has to be an option. If it is not, or if it is ignored, the government attorney is not the right person for the job, or the government seriously needs a good ethics program with an ethics officer to say "No" and have enforcement powers when she is ignored.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
203-859-1959
What struck me about the column is how similar Schumpeter's description of the CLO is to how a city or county attorney should be, but too often is not. One CLO is quoted as saying that "before taking the job, a lawyer should interview his chief executive. If you can’t say no to that person, 'you don’t want to work for that company.'" How many city attorneys have done this?
-
A CLO must be independent. But unlike outside lawyers, his financial
future depends on just one client: his employer. He must protect the
company’s reputation ... And he must do more than merely tell
managers what they can get away with. As Susan Hackett, a former
director of the Association of Corporate Counsel, says: “Most
lawyers will look at legal rules and say: ‘Here are the ways you can
do it.’ A good [general counsel] says: ‘Of course it’s legal, but
it’s stupid.’”
Government attorneys should recognize that they have an even stronger obligation than a CLO to be independent and to think about the reputation of the government rather than of its high-level officials. Saying "No" has to be an option. If it is not, or if it is ignored, the government attorney is not the right person for the job, or the government seriously needs a good ethics program with an ethics officer to say "No" and have enforcement powers when she is ignored.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
203-859-1959
Story Topics:
- Robert Wechsler's blog
- Log in or register to post comments