Nonviolence and Government Ethics III – Thinking Outside the Box
Another way in which violence and unethical conduct are similar is the
way they are handled by the news media. Just as violence is generally
discussed
in terms of separate
battles and wars, day by day, unethical conduct is discussed in terms
of separate
scandals and individuals, day by day. And unethical conduct is
responded to in the worst possible atmosphere.<br>
<br>
What this does is prevent an awareness of the problem of
unethical conduct in general and what constitutes a poor ethics
environment. In
addition, like war, unethical conduct becomes a spectator sport. People
curse or laugh at individual officials when they are caught. And the
whole web of relationships involved is ignored, at least beyond the
statement that "All politicians are crooks." Analysis takes a back seat
to blame.<br>
<br>
As Michael N. Nagler says in his book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Search-Nonviolent-Future-Ourselves-Families/dp/19…; target="”_blank”">The
Search
for
a
Nonviolent
Future</a>, "It's tons more effective not only to be working at the
root of the
problem instead of the leaves, but to be working there steadily instead
of being caught by surprise every time there's a violent incident. …
This process begins to work the minute we stop being taken in by the
details." Replace "violent incident" with "ethics scandal" and you have
excellent advice for the government ethics world.<br>
<br>
In this blog, I try to deal with government ethics situations as
examples of problems throughout the country. The names, genders,
ethnicity, and political parties don't matter. What matters is learning
the patterns, that is, recognizing what unethical conduct looks like,
how it occurs, how its perpetrators defend themselves, and how one can
respond to these acts and defenses in terms of laws, procedures, actions, and
ideas.<br>
<br>
This is the way nonviolence works. People who practice it learn its
techniques and then apply them in specific acts that are not necessarily
directed or limited to specific conduct.<br>
<br>
The local government ethics
world as a whole does not work like this. It consists of hundreds of
ethics officers, ethics bodies, gadflies, good government
groups, and other organizations, as well as many
thousands of local government attorneys and officials, and
journalists, all dealing with each situation practically in a vacuum,
with little or no knowledge of how things are done elsewhere, why
things are handled (or not handled) the way they are locally, and how
to change the local ethics program. It is rarely even recognized that
there is such a thing as a local ethics program, any more than most
people recognize in the midst of threats that there is such a thing as nonviolence.<br>
<br>
The lawyers who advise government officials know far more about
techniques, and the officials know far more about teamwork, than those
responsible for administering government ethics programs. It is rare
that anyone with expertise is contacted by anyone other than officials
involved in unethical conduct.<br>
<br>
Dealing with unethical conduct goes beyond simply reacting to it when
it
occurs. We must question the usual ways in which the ethics process
handles unethical conduct. For example, is it reasonable for an ethics
program to use most of its time and resources on enforcement? Does an
ethics commission have an obligation not simply to respond to
complaints and requests for advice, but also to take the initiative in
training, leading discussions, publicizing its advisory fucntion,
making general advisory statements, working and exchanging ideas with
other local ethics commissions, and recommending changes to the ethics
code?<br>
<br>
Acting unethically only requires selfishness and/or ignorance of what
is ethical. And sometimes cleverness, which is usually supplied by
lawyers. Acting ethically requires thinking outside the box, the sort
of cleverness your average lawyer isn't particularly accomplished at.
It requires not only critical thinking, but also self-critical
thinking. It requires going beyond the written laws and procedures. And it often requires courage, which is the subject of my next blog
post on nonviolence and government ethics.<br>
<br>
Robert Wechsler<br>
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics<br>
<br>
---