Yet Another Underhanded Attempt to Water Down the Broward County Ethics Commission's New Ethics Code
<b>Update:</b> August 9, 2010 (see below)<br>
<br>
You've got to hand it to them: Broward County (FL) commissioners don't
give up. Some of them have fought and fought against the prospect of
having <a href="http://www.broward.org/EthicsCommission/Documents/CodeofEthics2010%20-%…; target="”_blank”">a
new ethics code</a>, written by the county ethics commission. August 10
is the deadline by which they must either approve the new ethics code,
or it will appear on the November ballot.<br>
<br>
After <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/broward-county-commission-should-not-…; target="”_blank”">the
county attorney's attempt in June</a> to declare parts of the code
unconstitutional or beyond the EC's authority led to a backlash against
the idea of undermining the code, and then <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/second-constitutionality-opinion-brow…; target="”_blank”">an
independent lawyer's memo</a> taking the same position also failed,
there was only one possible way to stop the inevitable: water
down the code with a so-called "glitch ordinance."<br>
<br>
But wait. The drafters of the code were smart enough to put in a clause
that would prevent the code from being watered down by the very people
it was intended to regulate. Here's the clause:<ul>
The Board of County Commissioners may at any time strengthen or
supplement the restrictions and protections provided under this Code,
but the restrictions and protections hereof may be weakened or
removed, in whole or in part, only by citizen initiative as referenced
in Section 7.01 of the Broward County Charter.</ul>
That seems pretty ironclad. Which is why <a href="http://205.166.161.204/docs/2010/CCPH/20100810_192/5897_CodeofEthicsGli…; target="”_blank”">the
glitch ordinance</a> (p. 7) strikes this clause as well as weakens the
code.<br>
<br>
Voting against the code and letting voters decide would be a perfectly
acceptable thing to do. But voting for the code and at the same time
castrating it — well, it's not going to happen, even in Broward County.
I can't see why it was even proposed. Did anyone really believe they'd
get away with it?<br>
<br>
The weakening is just a followup to the failed constitutionality
and authority arguments, affecting the same provisions, the prohibitions on commissioners lobbying
local governments in the county and the jurisdiction over commissioners' family members.
As I said, these people don't give up.<br>
<br>
Also see the <a href="http://205.166.161.204/docs/2010/CCPH/20100810_192/5897_CodeofEthicsGli…; target="”_blank”">scratched-up
version of the ethics code</a> that will be voted on by the
commissioners on August 10. These changes are beneficial, as far as I
could tell.<br>
<br>
Thanks to ethics commissioner Bob Wolfe for alerting me to what was
happening.<br>
<br>
<b>Update:</b> August 9, 2010<br>
For the sake of entertainment, here is how Fred Grimm began <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/07/1766485/villains-of-ethics-reform…; target="”_blank”">his Miami <i>Herald</i> column this weekend</a>: "You've got to appreciate the brazen hand behind this latest attempt to eviscerate ethics reform in Broward County. Same way you watch, with perverse fascination, horror movie villains creeping back from oblivion to wreak more mayhem."<br>
<br>
Robert Wechsler<br>
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics<br>
<br>
---