Skip to main content

City Related

A Circuit Judge in Chicago Gets the Government Attorney-Client Privilege Wrong

<br>
A city creates the position of inspector general in order to root out,
and hopefully prevent, corruption. The inspector general decides to
investigate a situation. A city attorney is involved. The
attorney-client privilege is invoked. The investigation is blocked. And
the word goes out:  if you want to hide your corrupt conduct,
involve a city attorney. It's that simple.<br>
<br>

Fishing for Conflicts

<b>Update</b>: April 29, 2010 (see below)<br>
<br>
The idea of a possible conflict of interest should not be an excuse for
a fishing expedition to find relationships between local government
legislators and people or contracts they vote on. This appears to be
what is happening in Crossville, a town of 9,000 in east-central
Tennessee.<br>
<br>

Making a Gray Area Black and White

Gray areas in local government ethics don't necessarily have to be gray
areas.<br>
<br>
According to <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/councilman-says-hell-vote-467804.html&q…; target="”_blank”">an
article last week in the Atlanta <i>Journal-Constitution</i></a>, a council
member whose brother is a lieutenant in the city jail has been very

A Legislative IG for Chicago?

Back in Chicago, where in February the mayor called for the inspector
general (appointed by the mayor) to have jurisdiction over the city
council (see <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/camels-back-truly-broken-or-just-more…; target="”_blank”">my
blog post</a>), the council is now moving toward a council-wide vote on
its own inspector general.<br>
<br>

Some Problems Relating to Local Governments Accepting Gifts

Local governments accepting gifts from those who do business with them
— contractors, developers, and the like — can cause some serious
problems, even when they have to be approved by neutral bodies. This
can be seen by what has happened in Middletown, CT, a small city not
far from where I live.<br>
<br>

Vive Les Differences!

One of the biggest differences between unethical conduct and criminal
conduct by government officials is the matter of proving intent. For
example, a bribe is nothing more than a gift to a government official
where it has been proven that the official intentionally took a gift in return for certain conduct. In government ethics, taking a gift beyond a certain value is all that needs to be proven to show misconduct. The official's conduct, beyond accepting the gift, is
irrelevant, as is the official's intent.<br>
<br>

Lawyers Who Want to Be Excluded from Government Ethics Codes

Government lawyers enjoy exceptions to transparency laws. Should they
also be excepted from government ethics laws? Atlanta senior assistant
city attorney Robert N. Godfrey thinks so, according to <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/board-puts-attorneys…
article in yesterday's Atlanta <i>Journal-Constitution</i></a>.<br>
<br>