It's sad that it
took the Appellate Division of New York state's Supreme Court
(not the top court in the state) to disqualify a town attorney from
a case when that attorney's firm had represented the opposing party in a matter substantially related to the case.
On April 17, the District of Columbia ethics board filed
recommendations for ethics reform with the council (see my
blog post on the recommendations). Council member Kenyan R.
McDuffie has introduced a bill that includes some of these
recommendations (attached; see below).
When people write about public campaign financing programs, they
tend to focus on participation percentages and the size of the
campaign contributions.
On August 29, the D.C. Board of Ethics and Government Accountability
issued an advisory opinion on the important and far too overlooked
topic of constituent services (attached; see below). The issuing of
advisory opinions that cover more than a very specific set of facts,
what I call "general advisory opinions," is itself very valuable (see
the
section of my bookLocal Government Ethics Programs on general
advisory opinions).
Gifts to a local official can fall between jurisdictional cracks, as
shown in an
article today in the New York Times. They can also fall between
definitional cracks. And between these cracks it's gray.
The article reports that, a couple of years ago, Newark NJ's mayor, Cory Booker, who is running
for U.S. Senate, was given money by several high-tech executives to
found a high-tech company.
Once again, the failure to work out in advance the relationship
between an ethics commission and an inspector general's office has
led to the locking of horns in the midst of an ethics proceeding.
This time the location of the turf war is the District of Columbia.
On Friday, New Orleans' Inspector General, who works for the city's ethics board, sent off two
letters relating to the auditor for the Orleans Parish sheriff's
office.