You are here
Council Accounts - Conflicts and a Lack of Transparency
Friday, January 16th, 2009
Robert Wechsler
A year ago, I wrote about New York City Council's earmark funds and the ways they were
being abused. Atlanta's council members have a different sort of
fund, not intended to help their constituents, but intended to help
themselves. They too are open to abuse and, according to an
article in yesterday's Atlanta Journal-Constitution,
the city's ethics board has fined two council members for their abuse of
these funds.
One council member "spent $11,200 from his council account since 2006 to pay NGP Software, a political consulting firm, to provide information about voters in his district." He was fined $750, and has to repay the money to the city.
Another council member spent $15,000 to hire his brother's company to help put together town hall meetings, outings for senior citizens to the Georgia Aquarium, and T-shirts with the council member's name on them. The council member insisted that his brother made no profit on the transactions, but the city's ethics code was amended in 2006 to make it a violation to hire or do business with an immediate family member. He will pay two fines totalling $15,000.
For more on how council members spent their accounts, see this article from the Journal-Constitution.
According to an AJC editorial from October, in 2008 the council accounts were reduced from $30,000 to just $1,800, due to the city's budget crisis. But since annual funds stay in the accounts year after year, some council members still have a lot of money to spend (as much as $100,000), and they don't want to give the money back to the city.
Transparency is another important issue with council accounts, as it was in New York City. According to the editorial, "When asked by the AJC, the [city finance] department could not come up with the balances remaining in each council member’s spending accounts. Nor could the department produce any records for 2008 spending by council members." It was an article in the AJC that made all this public.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
One council member "spent $11,200 from his council account since 2006 to pay NGP Software, a political consulting firm, to provide information about voters in his district." He was fined $750, and has to repay the money to the city.
Another council member spent $15,000 to hire his brother's company to help put together town hall meetings, outings for senior citizens to the Georgia Aquarium, and T-shirts with the council member's name on them. The council member insisted that his brother made no profit on the transactions, but the city's ethics code was amended in 2006 to make it a violation to hire or do business with an immediate family member. He will pay two fines totalling $15,000.
For more on how council members spent their accounts, see this article from the Journal-Constitution.
According to an AJC editorial from October, in 2008 the council accounts were reduced from $30,000 to just $1,800, due to the city's budget crisis. But since annual funds stay in the accounts year after year, some council members still have a lot of money to spend (as much as $100,000), and they don't want to give the money back to the city.
Transparency is another important issue with council accounts, as it was in New York City. According to the editorial, "When asked by the AJC, the [city finance] department could not come up with the balances remaining in each council member’s spending accounts. Nor could the department produce any records for 2008 spending by council members." It was an article in the AJC that made all this public.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
Story Topics:
- Robert Wechsler's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
