You are here
The Problems with a Mayoral Booster Organization
Wednesday, July 16th, 2014
Robert Wechsler
Is it appropriate for a mayor — especially a mayor in a city with
strict gift rules and a public campaign financing program that has
strict campaign contribution limits — to work with an organization
that lobbies the state on behalf of his policies and sponsors ads
and materials that support his views and, especially, celebrate his
successes?
This is the situation in New York City, where Bill de Blasio, in his first year in office, is being celebrated by an entity called Campaign for One New York (CONY), which announced yesterday its expenditures and contributors (in keeping with de Blasio's support of transparency, it went well beyond the requirement of disclosing contributors of over $5,000).
I would like to focus on two of the problems with CONY. One is that it is a way for those seeking special benefits from the city government to get around campaign finance and gift limitations (and for the mayor to engage in pay to play). As Dick Dadey, the director of Citizens Union, is quoted as saying in today's New York Daily News, “It’s a brand-new way of currying favor with the mayor. It’s legal, but it’s unseemly.” It is similar to a favored mayoral charity (see the section of my book Local Government Ethics Programs on pet charities).
Large contributions to CONY were made not only by those who support pre-K education, which has been CONY's focus so far (and the mayor's, policywise). They were also made by developers, unions, and taxi companies.
The second problem is expenditures to celebrate the realization of the mayor's pre-K policy. This makes CONY less a supporter of the mayor's policies and more a supporter of the mayor. Combined with the fact (according to an article in today's New York Times) that the mayor and his wife have been deeply involved with CONY — half of CONY's expenditures have been spent on a celebratory television ad featuring de Blasio's wife — the appearance is of the mayor getting around laws to create a permanent campaign for his re-election. No amount of disclosure can cure this appearance.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
This is the situation in New York City, where Bill de Blasio, in his first year in office, is being celebrated by an entity called Campaign for One New York (CONY), which announced yesterday its expenditures and contributors (in keeping with de Blasio's support of transparency, it went well beyond the requirement of disclosing contributors of over $5,000).
I would like to focus on two of the problems with CONY. One is that it is a way for those seeking special benefits from the city government to get around campaign finance and gift limitations (and for the mayor to engage in pay to play). As Dick Dadey, the director of Citizens Union, is quoted as saying in today's New York Daily News, “It’s a brand-new way of currying favor with the mayor. It’s legal, but it’s unseemly.” It is similar to a favored mayoral charity (see the section of my book Local Government Ethics Programs on pet charities).
Large contributions to CONY were made not only by those who support pre-K education, which has been CONY's focus so far (and the mayor's, policywise). They were also made by developers, unions, and taxi companies.
The second problem is expenditures to celebrate the realization of the mayor's pre-K policy. This makes CONY less a supporter of the mayor's policies and more a supporter of the mayor. Combined with the fact (according to an article in today's New York Times) that the mayor and his wife have been deeply involved with CONY — half of CONY's expenditures have been spent on a celebratory television ad featuring de Blasio's wife — the appearance is of the mayor getting around laws to create a permanent campaign for his re-election. No amount of disclosure can cure this appearance.
Robert Wechsler
Director of Research-Retired, City Ethics
---
Story Topics:
- Robert Wechsler's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
