Public Campaign Finance

Paying Relatives to Work on Council Campaigns - Issues of Trust

Once again, the New York Times has an article today that touches on municipal ethics issues. A municipal scandal does wonders.

This time the issue is campaigns hiring relatives of city council candidates. It happens all the time, and it’s not illegal (in New York City and most of the country), but as Susan Lerner, the executive director of New York Common Cause, is quoted as saying, “It’s the type of thing which makes ordinary voters suspicious of the motives of candidates. It’s the sort of thing that makes ordinary voters dislike politicians.”

Click here to read the rest of this blog entry.

- Fri, 2008-04-25 08:32

Does the Constitution Truly Require Pay-to-Play? The New Campaign Finance Lawsuit in New York City

Campaign finance is an area of municipal ethics that is often treated as a separate field entirely. But they’re closely related. Both involve the conflict between private and public interest, and especially gifts to elected officials. The principal difference is that campaign contributions are a perfectly legal way of giving to elected officials, which makes the problem a bit more complex.

I began administering the public campaign financing program in New Haven, Connecticut last year. For me, it was an area of municipal ethics I knew little about, and this was a great way to learn it. But I haven’t written about campaign financing here, because it’s a bit off the track.

I would, however, like to say a few things about a suit against the New York City Campaign Finance Board, filed by attorney James Bopp, Jr, general counsel of the James Madison Center for Free Speech, who brought down Vermont’s public campaign financing program in 2006. I think the suit's implications are frightening.

Click here to read the rest of this blog entry.

- Sun, 2008-03-02 09:59

Can a Postage Stamp Be a Bribe?

When we talk about gifts to politicians, we often talk about gifts of nominal value being okay. Buy a politician a coffee, what’s wrong with that?

But what happens when it’s the other way around? What if the politician buys a coffee for a citizen? One citizen, no problem. A few more at a fundraiser, that’s okay (and it's not buying votes, but rather buying more money). But what about thousands of citizens? When does something of nominal value become something with a corrupt intention?

Click here to read the rest of this blog entry.

- Sat, 2008-02-23 08:14