In
October, I wrote a blog post about a report commissioned by
the Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority (WMATA), based on an investigation of an
ethics issue involving a Washington, D.C. council member and transit
authority board member. The focus of my post was on the conflicted
situation of a city council member on a regional...
A situation that arose recently in Atlanta shows how important
it is to require applicant disclosure of relationships with local
government officials, and to hold applicants accountable. According to an
article in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Atlanta's ethics
office dismissed allegations that a council member had sponsored and
voted on a no-bid contract when...
With the frequent confusion of person and office, sometimes it's not
that easy to tell the difference between a gift to a local
government agency and a gift to its director. This confusion can
open an agency director to accusations of ethical misconduct.
Independent agencies, especially those with lots of money to spend
and contracts to enter into, require not just ethics policies, but a
comprehensive, independent ethics program. This rarely acknowledged
fact has been made clear once again by an external audit of an
agency that proved completely unable to self-regulate its officials'
and employees' conflicts of interest. The agency is the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority
(MWAA), which...
Intimidation is, I believe, the worst kind of ethical misconduct in
government, because (1) it limits or changes participation of
people in the democratic
process, (2) it is emotionally damaging, and (3) it enables all
sorts of ethical misconduct. Intimidation is a fundamental form of
misuse of power and position. (For more about
intimidation, see the
section of my book on this topic...