Skip to main content

A Possible Cause of Action When an Official Retaliates Against a Citizen

What can a citizen do when a local government official falsely impugns
her reputation and retaliates against her due to her opposition to a
matter the official supports? The City Ethics Model Code has<a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/full-text-model-ethics-code#0.1_TOC50…; target="”_blank”">
a provision that deals with an official falsely impugning a citizen's

An Important Court Decision on Limiting and Banning Campaign Contributions from Restricted Sources

The law on limiting campaign expenditures has been changing over the
past couple of years. But the law on limiting campaign contributions
has not.
The standard in many instances is more liberal than with campaign expenditures, in others it is the
same. And the application of the standard is highly contextual. A law in one jurisdiction, or at a particular time, might be constitutional, while in another jurisdiction, or at a different time, it is not.<br>
<br>
Contribution limits are an important part of government ethics,

Toward Better Ethics Rules, Training, Oversight, and Enforcement in a Florida School District

I've been writing a lot about the controversies surrounding a new
Broward County (FL) ethics code, but there's also been controversy in
the Broward County School District that is likely to lead to an ethics code of its own (according to <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/14/1775493/focus-on-ethics.html&quot; target="”_blank”">a
Miami

A Limit on the Use of the Legislative Immunity Defense

The defense of legislative immunity is not limited to city councilors and county
commissioners. It also can be used by non-legislative officials acting in a
legislative way. It may be used by planning and
zoning board members and officials, school board members, and a variety
of other officials involved in the creation of legislation or who act in a legislative manner.<br>
<br>
Here's an interesting case of a non-legislative official trying out a
defense of legislative immunity and, fortunately, failing. The official

Gifts from Restricted Sources

Gifts from restricted sources, that is, from those doing business with
the local government (and their lobbyists), are exceptionally damaging, in that they make the public believe their officials can be bought or that their officials are running a pay-to-play government. It's too bad that at least some members of the Los Angeles ethics commission don't recognize this.<br>
<br>

Simultaneous, Political Appointments and the Ethical Culture of an Authority

The <a href="http://www.drpa.org&quot; target="”_blank”">Delaware River Port Authority</a>
(DRPA) has been getting a lot of heat lately. The bi-state organization
operates four toll bridges and a commuter system between
Philadelphia and southern New Jersey.<br>
<br>

The Advantages of Annual Financial Disclosure

Here's a good followup to <a href="http://www.cityethics.org/content/officials-possibly-conflicting-intere…; target="”_blank”">yesterday's
blog
post</a> about a conflict of interest in Tucson. In that post, I
argued that annual financial disclosure makes it clear that an
official's basic interests are public information, and said, "The goal

Tags

An Official's Possibly Conflicting Interests Are Public Information

Recusal is a two-part process. First, the official discloses his
interest in a matter that has or will come before his board or agency.
Then, the official does not participate in that matter.<br>
<br>
In Tucson, this process was distorted by the involvement of a board
attorney. According to <a href="http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_e1581d0f-d71c…; target="”_blank”">an