Good and Bad News from Memphis
The good news from Memphis is that newly-elected mayor A. C. Wharton,
Jr. issued an ethics executive order last week (attached; see below).
The order's provisions, which do not apply to council and its staff,
are less valuable in their own right than as a prod to the council to
improve the current
ethics code.
In August, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
granted a former state representative a temporary
restraining order with respect to a state revolving door provision
that prohibits state representatives from representing anyone other
than a state political subdivision before the state legislature for one
year after leaving office.
This summer, several New Jersey local government officials were
arrested in a big FBI sting operation (see my blog post). Yesterday, an
ethics audit focused on development practices was released.
Requested by the Jersey City council, it was written by three members
of a New Jersey law firm.
Ethics reform aimed at political opponents is a good way to undermine the whole idea of ethics reform. This is what is happening in San Jose.
San Jose starts off with an odd ethics program. Title 12: Ethics Provisions does not even have a conflict of
interest provision, nor does the city have an ethics commission. It is primarily
a campaign finance and lobbying law, with a gift...
The relationship between San Diego's council and ethics commission
continues to prove unhealthy. It shows how wrong it is for elected
officials to appoint and control the body that oversees their conduct.